Recently in Regionalism Category

Gallup has surveyed Americans for religion's importance and broken the results up by state. Here's the map:

Importance of Religion.png


So what's the explanation? Says Gallup: The question of why residents of some states (e.g., Mississippi and other Southern states) are highly likely to report that religion is an important part of their lives, while residents of other states (e.g., Vermont and other New England states) are much less likely to report the same is fascinating, but difficult to answer simply. Well, the simplest explanation is membership in religious institutions. New England and the Pacific Northwest (OR, WA, AK) have the lowest membership rates, with the rest of the West (except Utah and New Mexico) not far behind. By contrast, what we call the Southern Crossroads (TX, OK, LA, AR, MO) and some but not all states in the South have the highest membership rates. Of course, that to some extent begs the question, which Gallup does not presume to answer. In case you're interested, I can recommend Silk and Walsh, One Nation Divisible: How Regional Religious Differences Shape American Politics.

And while we're on the subject, in the past election, Obama carried all the least religious states except Alaska, while McCain carried all the most religious except North Carolina and all the "more religious" except Virginia and Indiana. Other than McCain's Arizona, the three northernmost Mountain states (ID, MT, and WY), and two-thirds of Nebraska, Obama carried all the "less religious" and "average" states. In other words, the 2008 election makes clear how much of a dividing line religiosity is in American politics.

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

domino effect.jpegWith all the hoopla over California's Proposition 8, it went largely unnoticed that on election day Washington joined Oregon in permitting physician-assisted suicide. Now a judge in the nearly adjoining state of Montana has found that Montanans enjoy a state constitutional right to do the same. At the same time, and with the lack of commotion that usually characterizes the Land of Steady Habits, Connecticut, having joined its more rambunctious neighbor immediately to the north in permitting same-sex marriages, voted down a constitutional convention that might have done away with them. New York, for its part, now recognizes even if it will not (yet) perform them, while Vermont, New Hampshire, and New Jersey have put civil union laws on the books. Call it the domino effect of social change in America.

| 0 Comments | No TrackBacks

Subscribe to this blog's feed

  • Prof Wigglesworth: Jeff is nothing but a shrill for the Zionists. This battle goes back 2000 years. His book is ANTI-CHRIST AND ANTI-CHRISTIAN. He is the counterpart to the anti-Jews. His book read more
  • wyn: Mr. Silk. You might like to read the Amazon.com book review of The Foundation entitled 'dangerously misleading ... a missed opportunity' by a reviewer living in Sydney Australia. He says read more
  • Jeff Sharlet: Thanks for this close reading, Mark. In the same spirit, I’m responding with some corrections and clarifications. You write: “And so it was, that having been tipped off about a read more
  • j.gibbons: I'm trying to wade through this. First of all, abortion is not a "health" procedure. It is a killing of "life" not life sustaining. That's why it's called "health serices/reproductive read more
  • Thomas J. Miller: Please look at this website for a modern day revival of a health approach to the Judeo-Christian outlook. www.Tomin12.com read more
  • Mark Silk: Thanks for the correction.As for the credit, I just (as most do) lifted it off Google, without diffing down to the source. Credit where credit is due, of course. But read more

Archives

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30